Roxen.git/ server/ etc/ modules/ RXML.pmod/ module.pmod

2009-02-26

2009-02-26 23:52:25 by Martin Stjernholm <mast@lysator.liu.se>

• 44b6e72e2392fb52fa52c0cceb9fae688412c772 (45 lines) (+41/-4) ^{[ Show | Annotate ]}
  Branch: 5.2

Do not implicitly propagate state_update events from evaluation in
exec arrays. Frames now has to do it explicitly through the new
RXML.Frame.exec_array_state_update callback.

This fixes a bug where persistent cache entries could get updated
continuously if they contain certain (fairly uncommon) rxml
combinations.

Note: This is strictly speaking an incompatible change of semantics,
although it should affect very few tags.

Rev: server/etc/modules/RXML.pmod/module.pmod:1.392

2:   //   // Created 1999-07-30 by Martin Stjernholm.   // - // $Id: module.pmod,v 1.391 2009/02/26 23:44:56 mast Exp $ + // $Id: module.pmod,v 1.392 2009/02/26 23:52:25 mast Exp $      // Kludge: Must use "RXML.refs" somewhere for the whole module to be   // loaded correctly.
3416:    //! each iteration). This variable is not automatically saved and    //! restored (see @[save] and @[restore]).    +  optional void exec_array_state_update(); +  //! If this is defined, it is called whenever p-code or frames are +  //! evaluated in an exec array (as returned by any of the +  //! @tt{do_*@} functions), and that evaluation causes their +  //! persistent state to change. +  //! +  //! Its typical use is to contain a call to +  //! @expr{RXML_CONTEXT->state_update@} to propagate the state update +  //! event if the exec array is part of the persistent state of this +  //! frame. +  //! +  //! @seealso +  //! @[do_enter], @[do_process], @[do_return], @[Context.state_update] +     optional string format_rxml_backtrace_frame();    //! Define this to control how the frame is formatted in RXML    //! backtraces. The returned string should be one line, without a
3699:    mixed res = nil;    Parser subparser = 0;    int orig_make_p_code = ctx->make_p_code; +  int orig_state_updated = ctx->state_updated;    PCode orig_evaled_p_code = ctx->evaled_p_code;    ctx->evaled_p_code = 0;   
3749:    // Could perhaps collect adjacent PCode objects here.    p_code->finish();    exec[i] = p_code; -  // Not flagging the update here in ctx->state_updated, -  // since we don't know whether this will be part of -  // the persistent p-code or not. +     }    result_type->give_back (subparser, ctx->tag_set);    subparser = 0;
3826:       ctx->make_p_code = orig_make_p_code;    ctx->evaled_p_code = orig_evaled_p_code; +  +  if (ctx->state_updated != orig_state_updated) { +  PCODE_UPDATE_MSG ("%O (frame %O): Restoring p-code update count " +  "from %d to %d after evaluating exec array.\n", +  ctx, this, ctx->state_updated, orig_state_updated); +  ctx->state_updated = orig_state_updated; +  if (exec_array_state_update) { +  PCODE_UPDATE_MSG ("Calling %O->exec_array_state_update.\n", this); +  exec_array_state_update(); +  } +  } +     return res;    };   
3833:       ctx->make_p_code = orig_make_p_code;    ctx->evaled_p_code = orig_evaled_p_code; +  +  if (ctx->state_updated != orig_state_updated) { +  PCODE_UPDATE_MSG ("%O (frame %O): Restoring p-code update count " +  "from %d to %d after evaluating exec array.\n", +  ctx, this, ctx->state_updated, orig_state_updated); +  ctx->state_updated = orig_state_updated; +  if (exec_array_state_update) { +  PCODE_UPDATE_MSG ("Calling %O->exec_array_state_update.\n", this); +  exec_array_state_update(); +  } +  } +     if (objectp (err) && ([object] err)->thrown_at_unwind) {    THIS_TAG_DEBUG ("Exec: Interrupted at position %d\n", i);    UNWIND_STATE ustate;